JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 27, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Nohora Maria Salcedo Ceron Vs. Banco Agrario De Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Sexto Civil Municipal De Popayan Y El Juzgado Sexto Del Circuito Administrativo De Popayan. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Sexto Del Circuito Administrativo De Popayan
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de juez del circuito
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Aparente
  • Aplicación Decreto 1382 de 2000
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Sexto. del Circuito Administrativo de Popayan para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Nohora Maria Salcedo Ceron contra el Banco Agrario de Colombia SA.
  3. Segundo. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaria General, la presente sentencia al Juzgado
  4. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Popayan, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la misma.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.