JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 5, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera

✓Claimant Luz Angela Delgado Franco

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Nego Solicitud De Nulidad De Sentencia De Tutela
  • Negar por improcedente, por cuanto el recurso sólo procede contra la providencia que decide rechazar la demanda de inconstitucionalidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de súplica contra el Auto 1085/22, mediante el cual se rechazó por improcedente la solicitud de nulidad presentada en contra de la Sentencia T-148/21 y el Auto 1188/21.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación recordó que el recurso de súplica solo procede contra el auto del magistrado sustanciador que decide el rechazo de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad, por lo que el recurso formulado en esta oportunidad deviene improcedente y por eso decidió RECHAZARLO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud formulada por Luz Ángela Delgado Franco contra el Auto 1085 de 2022.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional que comunique la presente providencia a los interesados, con la advertencia de que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.