A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
✓Claimant Fanny Cecilia Romero Rojas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto la corrección presentada no suplió las fallas argumentativas que llevaron a su inadmisión.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación reitera que cuando la corrección de una demanda no subsana los defectos advertidos en su inadmisión, debe ser rechazada.
En consecuencia, decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 23 de febrero de 2017, proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Ponente en el proceso D-11936, doctor Jorge Ivan Palacio Palacio, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Fanny Cecilia Romero Rojas contra la totalidad de la Ley 1607 de 2012.
- Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.