JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 12, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Diego Gutierrez Perez Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitudes De Aclaración De La Sentencia Su.389/05. No Proceden Las Solicitudes De Aclaración De Las Sentencias Presentadas Por Autoridades Publicas O Por Las Partes Involucradas En Procesos De Competencia De Esta Corporación. Negadas
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fallo De Tutela
  • Reiteración de la improcedencia
Padre Cabeza De Familia
  • Límite del “retén social” según parámetros establecidos en sentencia SU389 de 2005
Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR las solicitudes de aclaración de la Sentencia SU-389 de 2005, por las razones expuestas en este Auto.
  2. Segundo. NEGAR la solicitud presentada por el Apoderado General de TELECOM EN LIQUIDACIÓN relativa a la ampliación del plazo fijado en el numeral diez del fallo.
  3. Tercero. Informar a los señores Diego Gutiérrez Pérez, José de Jesús Becerra Avendaño, al Apoderado General de TELECOM EN LIQUIDACIÓN, a Humberto Alba Reyes y a Ilvar Valderrama Díaz que contra el presente Auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.