A- de 2021
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Harold Eduardo Sua Montaña
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por impertinente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación formulada contra el Magistrado Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar, para participar en la decisión de la solicitud de nulidad del auto 471/20, mediante el cual se resolvió un recurso de súplica interpuesto frente al rechazo de una demanda de inconstitucionalidad.
Teniendo en cuenta que el peticionario no expuso una causal de impedimento específica y que sólo se limitó a indicar un tema procedimental referenciando circunstancias de impedimento respecto de otro proceso, se RECHAZÓ, por falta de pertinencia, la recusación invocada
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR, por falta de pertinencia, la recusacion formulada por el ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montana contra el Magistrado Jorge Enrique Ibanez Najar.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.