JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 29, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jose Vicente Paternina Peinado

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación para el caso cuando el demandado es el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió a la Sección Quinta, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado el expediente de la tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Atlántico, para que se resuelva de manera inmediata sobre la impugnación formulada, de acuerdo a lo establecido por el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 que dispone: “Primera instancia: Son competentes para conocer de la acción de tutela, a prevención, los jueces o tribunales con jurisdicción en el lugar donde ocurriere la violación o la amenaza que motivaren la presentación de la solicitud”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir a la Seccion Quinta, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado el expediente de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Jose Vicente Paternina Peinado contra la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Atlantico, para que se resuelva de manera inmediata sobre la impugnacion formulada.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.