JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 14, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Hilda Ines Alfonso Alfonso

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Santa María (Boyaca), Juzgado Civil Del Circuito De Garagoa Y El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Sogamoso.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra El Seguro Social
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente al Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Garagoa para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, toda vez que la Corte Constitucional, considera que conforme a lo dispuesto por el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, según el cual “son competentes para conocer de la acción de tutela, a prevención, los jueces o tribunales con jurisdicción en el lugar donde ocurriere la violación o la amenaza que motivaren la presentación de la solicitud”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Garagoa para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.