JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 15, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Apoderado De Fiduciaria Davivienda S.A.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU.235/16.

El apoderado de la Fiduciaria Davivienda S.A. solicitó a la Corporación verificar el cumplimiento de las órdenes dictadas en la providencia de la referencia.

Considera la Corte que su intervención no es procedente en este caso, puesto que para tal fin es necesario que el juez competente se haya pronunciado y que la desobediencia persista; o que el juez competente no haya podido adoptar las medidas que hagan efectivas las órdenes; o las medidas hayan sido insuficientes o ineficaces, lo cual no ha ocurrido en el presente asunto.

Con base en lo anterior la Sala Plena decide ABSTENERSE de tramitar la petición de cumplimiento invocada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ABSTENERSE de tramitar la solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU-235 de 2016, promovida por el apoderado de la Fiduciaria Davivienda S.A.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se comunique la decision adoptada en esta providencia al apoderado de la Fiduciaria Davivienda S.A.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.