JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 21, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Federico Garcia Meyer.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Presidente De La Republica
  • Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
  • Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó no aplicar de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Art. 4° de la Constitución Política, el Art. 1º, numeral 2º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.

En consecuencia, se resolvió el conflicto indicando que el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Penal, es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el articulo 4deg de la Constitucion Politica, NO APLICAR el articulo 1o, numeral 2o del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
  2. SEGUNDO. Resolver el presente conflicto indicando que el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Penal, es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
  3. TERCERO. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Penal, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.