JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 15, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Quintero Muriel

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Inaplicación para el caso cuando el demandado es el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente contentivo de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia, a la Corte Suprema de Justicia - Sala de Casación Civil -, para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, en razón de lo dispuesto por los Arts. 86 de la Constitución Política y 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, órgano judicial ante el cual se instauró esta acción por el ciudadano.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Carlos Alberto Quintero Muriel contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia, a la Corte Suprema de Justicia - Sala de Casacion Civil -, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.