JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 30, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Caicedo Suarez Rodulfo·Respondent Colseguros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la acción de tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la E.P.S.

Colseguros, a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Segundo Civil del Circuito de Cúcuta toda vez que la Corte advirtió que este despacho judicial aplicó lo dispuesto en el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000, norma contraria a la Constitución.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al juzgado competente para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela interpuesta por Rodulfo Caicedo Suarez contra la E.P.S. Colseguros, a partir del auto de 10 de octubre de 2000, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del del Circuito de Cucuta.
  3. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Cucuta, para que de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.