JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 15, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Segundo Leonidas Rodriguez Giraldo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Conflicto De Competencia Positivo
  • Conocimiento de la Corte Suprema
  • Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura y Corte Suprema
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió a la Corte Suprema de Justicia el expediente de la tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que tramite lo que corresponda y la decida en forma inmediata, toda vez que la Corte Constitucional dará aplicación a lo dispuesto en el inciso 2º del numeral 2º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir a la Corte Suprema de Justicia el expediente de la accion de tutela interpuesta por
  2. Segundo. Leonidas Rodriguez Giraldo rlando contra la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que le de el tramite que corresponda y la decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.