A- de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero
✓Claimant Piedad Cecilia Velez Gaviria.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inaplicación para el caso
- Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
- Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se inaplicó el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.
En consecuencia, se decidió que no existe colisión de competencias para dirimir y se remitirá el expediente al Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Medellín que adquirió la competencia a prevención según se dijo en la parte motiva de este auto.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. En el presente caso, INAPLICASE, por inconstitucional, el articulo 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000. En consecuencia. DECIDIR que no existe colision de competencias para dirimir y en consecuencia por Secretaria se remitira el expediente del Juzgado
- Primero. Civil del Circuito de Medellin que adquirio la competencia a prevencion segun se dijo en la parte motiva de este auto.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.