JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 30, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Mejia Uron Sonia Ruth·Respondent Fondo Nacional De Prestaciones Del Magisterio

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la acción de tutela promovida por los ciudadanos de la referencia en contra del Fondo Nacional de Prestaciones del Magisterio a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Segundo Penal del Circuito de Ocaña.

Lo anterior, porque el citado despacho judicial aplicó lo dispuesto en el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000, norma que es manifiestamente contraria a la Carta Política.

En consecuencia, se remitió el expediente al mencionado Juzgado para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela promovida por los senores Sonia Ruth Mejia Uron y Wilmer Arenas Vergel en contra del Fondo Nacional de Prestaciones del Magisterio a partir del auto del 7 de septiembre de 2000 proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Ocana.
  3. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Ocana para que, de forma inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.