JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 21, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Pedro Antonio Duarte Gonzalez Vs. Tribunal Superior, Defensoria Del Pueblo De Valledupar, Procuraduria Regional Del Cesar, Procuraduria General De La Nacion Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Aparente Entre Corte Suprema De Justicia Sala De Casacion Penal Y Consejo De Estado Sala De Lo Contencioso Administrativo Seccion Cuarta. Tutelante No Especifico Especialidad Del Tribunal Superior Decreto 1382 De 2000. Conocimiento Del Consejo De Estado. Estado De Derecho. Competencia De Autoridades Publicas Y Distintas Jurisdicciones. Juez Natural.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia a la Seccion Cuarta de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Pedro Antonio Duarte Gonzalez contra el Tribunal Administrativo del Cesar, la Defensoria del Pueblo seccional Valledupar, la Procuraduria Regional del Cesar, la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, el Director de Epecamsual, el Director General del Inpec, el Director de la Carcel La Dorada.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto a la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.