JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 24, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jurado Hernandez Gloria Ines·Respondent Direccion Nacional De Estupefacientes

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Superior De Buga – Sala Civil Familia- Y El Consejo De Estado, Sala De Lo Contencioso Administrativo Seccion Cuarta. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Secciona Cuarta Del Consejo De Estado, Sala De Lo Contencioso Administrativo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia del superior funcional
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia residual para dirimir conflictos de competencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por Gloria Ines Jurado Hernandez contra la Direccion Nacional de Estupefacientes - Coordinacion de Cobro Coactivo a la Seccion Cuarta del Consejo de Estado, para que la tramite y resuelva.
  2. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  5. Magistrado
  6. CON SALVAMENTO DE VOTO
  7. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  8. Magistrado
  9. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  10. Magistrado
  11. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  12. Magistrado
  13. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  14. Magistrado
  15. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  16. Magistrado
  17. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  18. Magistrado
  19. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  20. Magistrada
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Reporting justice
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Dissenting opinion
Read dissent
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Presidente
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 2cited by 0 →A. 129/06C-666/00 — Funciones Administrativas Por Entes Vinculados. Atribución Por Parte Del Legislador · cited 21 timesC-666/002000A. 067/03 — Conflicto De Competencia · cited 14 timesA. 067/032003
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites2
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.