A- de 2013
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
✓Claimant Luz Esperanza Gomez Asis
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia para emitir conceptos jurídicos por carecer de competencia
- Rechazar petición de concepto jurídico sobre sentencia T-760A/11 por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de concepto jurídico en relación con la sentencia T-760A/12.
La memorialista solicitó a la Sala pronunciarse “sobre el querer” del numeral séptimo de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia referida, “con el objeto de evitar unos perjuicios irremediables a mis derechos laborales”.
La Sala recuerda que no le corresponde a la Corte Constitucional emitir conceptos jurídicos, menos aún sobre sentencias proferidas por la Corporación o apartes de la misma, en tanto se refiere a asuntos sobre los cuales ya carece de competencia.
Se RECHAZA la petición de concepto jurídico formulado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE:
- RECHAZAR la petición de concepto jurídico sobre la sentencia T-760A de 2011 formulada por Luz Esperanza Gómez Asís, por ser improcedente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.