JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 25, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Margarita Maria Jaramillo De Montoya Vs. Nueva Eps

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Catorce Administrativo Del Circuito De Medellin Y El Juzgado Decimo Tercero Penal Municipal Con Funcion De Transicion. Se Ordeno La Remision Del Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela De La Referencia Al Juzgado Catorce Administrativo Del Circuito De Medelli Para Que Adelante La Correspondiente Actuacion Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nueva Eps
  • Sociedad de economía mixta
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios
  • Naturaleza jurídica
Accion De Tutela Contra La Nueva Eps
  • Competencia de Juzgado Administrativo del Circuito
Sociedad De Economia Mixta
  • Constitución según Ley 489 de 1998
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por la senora Margarita Maria Jaramillo de Montoya contra la Nueva EPS, al Juzgado Catorce Administrativo del Circuito de Medellin, para adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Decimo.
  4. Tercero. Penal Municipal de Medellin con Funcion de Transicion , con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  5. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.