JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 15, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Angel Serafin Orjuela Sanchez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente contentivo de la tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Rosa de Viterbo y contra el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura –Sala Administrativa- al Tribunal Administrativo de Boyacá con el fin que resuelva lo que fuere pertinente, de conformidad a lo dispuesto en el Art. 1º, numeral 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Enviese al Tribunal Administrativo de Boyaca, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano Angel Serafin Orjuela Sanchez, contra el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Rosa de Viterbo y contra el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura -Sala Administrativa- a que se refiere la parte motiva de este auto, con el fin de que por ese Tribunal se resuelva lo que fuere pertinente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.