Order (Auto)May 23, 2007
A- de 2007
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Daniel Molina Angarita Vs. Juez De Primera Instancia Fuerza Naval Del Caribe
✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Cucuta, El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Cartagena Y El Juzgado Promiscuo Del Circuito Del Carmen De Bolivar. Corregir El Texto Del Auto 047 De 2007 Dentro Del Proceso Icc-1064 Remplazando En La Parte Resolutiva La Expresion “(…) Al Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Cartagena” Por La Expresion “(…) Al Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De San Jose De Cucuta”, Contenida En La Parte Resolutiva Del Texto Original
02
What it decided
This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Corregir el texto del Auto 47 de 2007 dentro del proceso ICC-1064, remplazando en la parte resolutiva la expresión "(...) al Juzgado
- Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Cartagena" por la expresión "(...) al Juzgado
- Segundo. Civil del Circuito de San José de Cúcuta", contenida en la parte resolutiva del texto original.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Reporting justice
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Dissenting opinion
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Presidente
04
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.