JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 16, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Hospital La Misericordia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración del Auto 009/21, mediante el cual se decretó una medida provisional en favor de parte accionante.

El Hospital La Misericordia le pidió a la Corporación aclarar los numerales primero y segundo de la parte resolutiva de la providencia de la referencia.

De manera concreta señaló que, es necesario tener plena claridad si en el caso de plena urgencia se debe o no realizar trasfusión a la paciente.

La Corte DENEGÓ la aclaración rogada y precisó que, con la medida provisional quedó en firme la sentencia de primera instancia que accedió a la pretensión principal de la accionante y ordenó que ésta recibiera atención médica alternativa a las transfusiones de sangre y de sus cuatro componentes principales, es decir, sin transfusiones.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaración del Auto 009 de 26 de enero de 2021, mediante el cual se decretó medida provisional en el expediente T-7.970.593, formulada por el Hospital La Misericordia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR y ENVIAR COPIA de la presente providencia a la accionante28, a la accionada29, a la Fundación Hospital La Misericordia de Bogotá30 y a la EPS Famisanar31.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.