JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 13, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera

✓Claimant Luz Angela Delgado Franco

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Adicion De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos de procedencia excepcional
Solicitud De Adicion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
  • Rechazar por improcedente
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de adición de la Sentencia T-148/21.

La peticionaria argumentó que algunos puntos no fueron definidos al proferir el precitado fallo, pese a ser determinantes para la resolución de la controversia.

En concreto, estimó que se omitió la valoración de numerosas pruebas allegadas al proceso.

La Corte RECHAZÓ por improcedente la anterior pretensión, dado el incumplimiento del presupuesto formal de carga argumentativa.

Ello, por cuanto se constató que la solicitud de complementación se incoó con el único propósito de que se adicione la sentencia en los términos que, a juicio de la solicitante, se hacía necesario.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la peticion de adicion o complementacion de la Sentencia T-148 de 2021, formulada por la ciudadana Luz Angela Delgado Franco, atendiendo a las razones expuestas en la parte motiva del presente Auto.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE el contenido del presente Auto a la peticionaria, advirtiendole que contra esta determinacion no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceDiana Constanza Fajardo RiveraConcurrenceJorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.