A- de 2013
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
✓Claimant Jairo Villegas Arbelaez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar recurso de súplica
- Recurso de súplica
- Corrección
- Admisión y rechazo de la demanda
- Reglas
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de Súplica interpuesto en contra del auto del 26 de abril de 2013, dictado por el magistrado Nilson Pinilla Pinilla para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, al no ser corregida en el término concedido para el efecto.
La Sala considera que las razones expuestas por el demandante en el recurso de súplica, no lo relevan de haber agotado en su oportunidad el mecanismo que tenía a su disposición.
Se decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del veintiseis (26) de abril de 2013, por el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Jairo Villegas Arbelaez, contra una de las expresiones contenidas en el numeral 3deg del articulo 21 de la Ley 909 de 2004.
- SEGUNDO. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.