JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Alfonso Angarita Avila

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 1122 De 2007 Articulos 20 (Parcial), 34 Literales A, B Y C. Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nación Para Rendir Concepto En El Proceso De La Referencia. No Se Acepta El Impedimento
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Negado porque su intervención se realizó antes de que el Gobierno presentara proyecto de ley
Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Alcance de la causal de intervención en la expedición de la norma acusada
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR el impedimento manifestado por el Señor Procurador, doctor Edgardo José Maya Villazón, para emitir concepto de fondo en relación con la demanda de inconstitucionalidad correspondiente al expediente D-6762, por las razones expuestas.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que, una vez levantada la suspensión por Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA el expediente al señor Procurador General de la Nación para que proceda a rendir el concepto de rigor, dentro del término procesal que aún resta.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.