JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 30, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Edgar Hernandez Ferro

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Adicion Sentencia Su-038/08. Rechazar Por Improcedente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Adicion De Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia como mecanismo procesal
Adicion De Sentencia
  • Procedencia mediante sentencia complementaria según Código de Procedimiento Civil
Fallo De Tutela
  • Reiteración de la improcedencia de corrección o adición
Sentencia De Revision De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia de la adición pues constituye un mecanismo para complementar providencias
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de adición de la sentencia SU-038 dictada por la Sala Plena el 23 de enero de 2008.
  2. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAÚJO RENTERÍA
  5. Magistrado Ponente
  6. MANUEL JOSÉ CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  7. Magistrado
  8. JAIME CÓRDOBA TRIVIÑO
  9. Magistrado
  10. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  11. Magistrado
  12. MAURICIO GONZÁLEZ CUERVO
  13. Magistrado
  14. AUSENTE CON PERMISO
  15. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  16. Magistrado
  17. NILSON PINILLA PINILLA
  18. Magistrado
  19. CLARA INÉS VARGAS HERNÁNDEZ
  20. Magistrada
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.