JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 30, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Ehiber J. Ordoñez Gallego

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Juzgado Quinto Civil del Circuito de Popayán asumir de manera inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Juzgado segundo civil municipal de Popayán, de conformidad con lo establecido en el inciso primero del numeral segundo del artículo primero del Decreto Reglamentario 1382 de 2000 “Cuando la acción de tutela se promueva contra un funcionario o corporación judicial, le será repartida al respectivo superior funcional del accionado”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Ordenar, al Juzgado
  2. Quinto. (5o) Civil del Circuito de Popayan asumir de manera inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela interpuesta por el senor Ehiber J. Ordonez Gallego contra el Juzgado
  3. segundo. (2o) civil municipal de Popayan.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.