JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 28, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Alvaro Pava Camelo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia .
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Inexistencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió la tutela del ciudadano de la referencia contra la Revista Cambio al Juzgado 11 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá para que adelante el proceso, en virtud de sus competencias constitucionales y legales.

La Corte explicó que visto el trámite procesal surtido hasta el momento, forzoso es concluir que en el presente caso no hay conflicto negativo de competencia.

En efecto, en el presente caso no existen dos despachos judiciales a los que se les haya remitido el proceso y se hayan negado a tramitarlo.

Para que exista un conflicto de competencia negativo deben existir, por lo menos, dos jueces que se hayan negado a conocer de una misma demanda.

En este momento no existe otro despacho judicial que se haya declarado incompetente para conocer de esta demanda.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir la accion de tutela de Alvaro Pava Camelo contra la Revista Cambio al Juzgado 11 Civil del Circuito de Bogota para que adelante el proceso, en virtud de sus competencias constitucionales y legales.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Presidente
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.