JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 25, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Maria Elena Orchuelo De Acosta Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Presidente De La Republica
  • Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
  • Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó no aplicar el Art. 1°, numeral 1° del Decreto 1382 de 2000 en cuanto modifica lo dispuesto por el Art. 86 de la Constitución y en el Decreto 2591 de 1991, restringiendo irrazonablemente el derecho de acceso a la administración de justicia.

Se declaró que, de acuerdo con el conflicto planteado, el Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Cundinamarca, Sala Penal, es competente para conocer del proceso de tutela de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NO APLICAR el articulo 1deg, numeral 1deg del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
  2. SEGUNDO. DECLARAR que, de acuerdo con el conflicto planteado, el Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Cundinamarca, Sala Penal, es competente para conocer del proceso de tutela de la referencia.
  3. TERCERO. PERMITIR, por medio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cundinamarca, Sala Penal, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.