JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 14, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Gustavo Gomez Garcia, Fiscal 234 (E)·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional dentro del término de ejecutoria, de oficio o a solicitud de parte
Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
Accion De Tutela De Niña Victima De Violencia Sexual Contra Fiscalía Seccional
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración a sentencia T-843/11 por extemporánea
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración de la sentencia T-843/11.

El peticionario solicita que se aclare la sentencia de la referencia, en cuanto al alcance del contenido del numeral 4º de la parte resolutiva, según el cual su despacho debía calificar el mérito de la investigación en el término máximo de un mes contado a partir de la notificación de la providencia, es decir, dictar una decisión en el marco de la indagación objeto de controversia.

Se decide RECHAZAR la petición de aclaración formulada, por ser presentada de manera extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR la peticion de aclaracion de la sentencia T-843 de 2011, formulada por Gustavo Gomez Garcia, Fiscal 234 Seccional (E), por ser extemporanea.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.