JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 16, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ciro Martinez Cruz Vs. Juzgado Sexto Penal Municipal De Popayan

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre Juzgado Quinto Penal Del Circuito De Popayan Y Juzgado Unico Penal Del Circuito De Honda. Competencia Aparente Y A Prevencion. Estado De Derecho. Competencia De Autoridades Publicas Y Distintas Jurisdicciones. Juez Natural.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
Accion De Tutela Contra Juzgado Penal Municipal
  • Competencia de Juez Penal del Circuito
  • Remisión expediente para su conocimiento y resolución bajo el apremio de los términos constitucionales y legales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Popayan, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, y dentro de los terminos establecidos, decida la accion de tutela interpuesta por Ciro Martinez Cruz contra el Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Penal Municipal de Popayan.
  4. Segundo. Comunicar por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Juzgado Unico Penal del Circuito de Honda, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.