JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 10, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jorge Alberto Munevar

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó el Art. 1º, numeral 1º, del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000 por ser incompatible, en relación con la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia.

En consecuencia, se declaró la nulidad del auto mediante el cual el Juzgado 20 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá aplicó el citado Decreto y remitió el expediente a los juzgados civiles municipales de Bogotá.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. INAPLICAR, en relación con la acción de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Jorge Alberto Munevar, el artículo 1º, numeral 1º, del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitución Política conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de este auto.
  2. SEGUNDO. DECLARAR LA NULIDAD del auto de 29 de abril de 2002 mediante el cual el Juzgado 20 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá aplicó el Decreto 1382 de 2000 en su artículo 1º, numeral 1º, y remitió el expediente a los juzgados civiles municipales de Bogotá.
  3. TERCERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado 20 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial.
  4. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.