JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 7, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jose Adelmo Barrera Mendez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Tribunal Administrativo Del Huila Vs. Juzgado Penal Del Circuito
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Entidades Descentralizadas Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
Impugnación Fallo De Tutela
  • Altas Corporaciones no tienen un superior jerárquico
  • Conocimiento por otra Sala de la misma Corporación
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de tutela al Juzgado Cuarto Penal del Circuito de Neiva para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, toda vez que esta Corte para resolver el caso concreto consideró el Art. 1, numeral 1, parágrafo 2, del Decreto 1382 de 2000 que señala: “a los Jueces del Circuito o con categorías de tales, le serán repartidas para su conocimiento, en primera instancia, las acciones de tutela que se interpongan contra cualquier organismo o entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional o autoridad pública del orden departamental”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado 4 Penal del Circuito de Neiva para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.