JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 9, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Ballesteros Baron Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto del 12 de julio de 2013, proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, luego de considerarse que no se verificaba, en realidad, una corrección de la misma en el sentido exigido en el auto de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena encuentra justificado el rechazo de la demanda, toda vez que, ni el escrito inicial, ni el de corrección, lograron desvirtuar la motivación que originó la inadmisión y posterior rechazo.

Se CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corporacion en ejercicio de sus competencias
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto de doce (12) de julio de dos mil trece (2013), por el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por los ciudadanos Carlos Alberto Ballesteros Baron y otros, contra el articulo 1, parcial, del Decreto 1042 de 1978.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.