JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 15, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Cielo Gonzalez Villa Vs. Edgar Artunduaga Sanchez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Penal Municipal De Neiva Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura Del Huila. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura Del Huila Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Senador De La Republica
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Cielo Gonzalez Villa, Alcaldesa de Neiva contra el Senador Edgar Artunduaga Sanchez, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Huila, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, para que se tramite y decida sin mas dilacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.