JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 19, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Gustavo Rojas Salazar

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica presentado contra el auto de 12 de abril de 2010, proferido por el Magistrado Humberto Sierra Porto, que rechazó la demanda de constitucionalidad de la referencia.

La Sala advierte que el recurso presentado es extemporáneo, por lo tanto se decide rechazarlo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR POR EXTEMPORÁNEO el recurso de súplica propuesto por el demandante contra el Auto proferido el 12 de abril de 2010 por el Magistrado Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, que rechazó la demanda formulada por Gustavo Rojas Salazar contra los artículos 4º y 5º de la Ley 890 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.