JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 9, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Pedro Julio Gámez Hinojosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Contra El Auto Del 29 De Octubre De 2007, Proferido Por El Magistrado Rodrigo Escobar Gil, Que Rechazó La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad De La Referencia. En Vista De La Presentación Extemporánea Del Recurso De Súplica, Se Resolvió Confirmar La Providencia A Través De La Cual Se Rechazó La Demanda En Cuestión.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Rechazo por ser actos que revisten el carácter de providencias judiciales y no de actos reformatorios de la Constitución
Recurso De Suplica
  • Mecanismo para controvertir decisión de rechazo de acción pública de inconstitucionalidad
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto del 29 de octubre de 2007, proferido por el Magistrado Rodrigo Escobar Gil, que rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Pedro Julio Gámez Hinojosa en contra de la Resolución No. 146038 de la Fiscalía Delegada ante el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Valledupar y la Sentencia No. 2005-02022-00 de la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.