JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 29, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Omar Ceballos Caceres

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Correccion De Contenido De Sentencia
  • Aplicación
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se corrige el numeral segundo de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia T-714/15, en el sentido de indicar que el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, dentro del proceso ordinario promovido por el actor en contra del ISS y la empresa Chevron Pretroleum Company, es del 2007 y no de 2011, como erróneamente se indicó.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. CORREGIR el numeral
  2. segundo. de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia T-714 de 2015 el cual quedará de la siguiente manera:
  3. "
  4. Segundo. Dejar sin efecto la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casación Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 22 de noviembre de 2007, dentro del proceso ordinario laboral promovido por Omar Ceballos Cáceres contra el ISS (hoy Colpensiones) y la empresa Chevron Petroleum Company, así como las sentencias adoptadas por el Juez
  5. Primero. Laboral del Circuito de Armenia el 25 de noviembre de 2005 y por la Sala laboral del Tribunal Superior de Armenia el 22 de febrero de 2006".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Reporting justice
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.