JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 4, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jose Alonso Gaviria Arango

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó inaplicar el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000, en relación con la acción de tutela a que se refiere esta providencia, por ser contrario a la Constitución Política.

Se dirimió el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre dos Tribunales de Medellín y de Cundinamarca, en el sentido de que su conocimiento corresponde al Tribunal Superior de Medellín - Sala Penal.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. INAPLICAR, en relacion con la accion de tutela a que se refiere esta providencia, el articulo 1o del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitucion Politica conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de este auto.
  2. SEGUNDO. Dirimir el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Medellin y el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca Seccion Tercera Subseccion B, en la accion de tutela instaurada por Jose Alonso Gaviria Arango, contra la Nacion, Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico, Ministerio de Educacion Nacional y Departamento Administrativo de la Funcion Publica, en el sentido de que su conocimiento corresponde al Tribunal Superior de Medellin - Sala Penal.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.