JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 17, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Modificar auto A.048/15 en el sentido de adicionar la agenda planteada en dicho proveído para desarrollo de sesión técnica convocada mediante auto A.047/15, con la in
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se modifica el ordinal primero de la parte resolutiva del auto 048 de 2015, en el sentido de adicionar la agenda planteada en dicho proveído, con la intervención del Contralor General del Departamento del Chocó.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. MODIFICAR EL ORDINAL
  2. PRIMERO. DE LA PARTE RESOLUTIVA DEL AUTO 48 DE 2015 para adicionar la agenda planteada en dicho proveído con la intervención del Contralor General del Departamento del Chocó, doctor Marco Antonio Sánchez Mena, en el espacio comprendido entre las 12:05 y las 12:20 p.m.
  3. SEGUNDO. Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, por Secretaría General remítase copia de esta providencia al Contralor General del Chocó al correo electrónico contactenos@contraloria-choco.gov.co
  4. Publíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.