JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 12, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓Claimant Gerardo Ermilson Amortegui Calderon

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Notificación por conducta concluyente según artículo 330 del Código de Procedimiento Civil en sentencia SU913/09
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia SU-913/09, ya que se decidió sobre un asunto de competencia exclusiva de la Jurisdicción Administrativa.

La Corte se pronuncia sobre los presupuestos que deben acreditarse para la procedencia de la solicitud de nulidad de las sentencias de tutela proferidas con ocasión de un trámite de revisión de esta corporación, se decide denegar la solicitud de nulidad por haber sido presentada extemporáneamente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. DENEGAR por extemporánea la petición de nulidad formulada por el señor GERARDO ERMILSON AMORTEGUI CALDERON.
  3. SEGUNDO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.