A- de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Marco Tulio Atuesta Bohorquez Vs. Inpec Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Libertad para elegir la especialidad del juez competente
- Procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se remitió el expediente al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Sección Primera, Subsección B para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, toda vez que fue la autoridad judicial competente escogida por el actor para su tramitación, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE:
- REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Primera, Subseccion B para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.