JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 8, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Sonia Milena Torres Castaño

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Recusacion En Proceso De Control Abstracto De Constitucionalidad
  • Se rechaza por sustracción de materia al haberse aceptado previamente el impedimento
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación formulada contra la Magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado para conocer el trámite de revisión oficiosa de constitucionalidad del Decreto Ley 898 de 2017.

La recurrente invocó la causal de interés en la decisión.

La Sala Plena considera que en el presente caso no hay materia sobre la cual pueda pronunciarse, toda vez que con el auto 084A/18 la Corporación aceptó el impedimento formulado por la Magistrada Ortiz y la separó del conocimiento del proceso RDL-031, mediante el cual se tramita la revisión oficiosa de constitucionalidad del Decreto Ley 898/17.

Se RECHAZA la recusación invocada por sustracción de materia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la recusacion presentada por la ciudadana Myriam Stella Ortiz Quintero contra la Magistrada GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO dentro del Expediente RDL - 031.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.