JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 24, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Miguel Ricardo Ramos Avendaño Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto proferido por el Magistrado Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez para rechazar la demanda de la referencia.

Advierte la Sala Plena que en el recurso estudiado los demandantes no atacaron directamente el auto de rechazo poniendo de manifiesto eventuales yerros u olvidos, sino que pretenden reconstruir, ampliar y reiterar los cargos presentados tanto en la demanda como en la corrección de la misma.

Con base en lo anterior, se decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 1o de febrero de 2016 dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador, Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez, por medio del que se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad identificada con el número de radicación D-11166, presentada por los ciudadanos Miguel Ricardo Ramos Avendaño y Ornar Sandoval Fernández.
  2. Notifíquese, cúmplase, archívese el expediente e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.