JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 11, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Silvio Efrain Benavides Rosero·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Correccion Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Aplicación del artículo 286 del Código General del Proceso
Sentencia De Constitucionalidad En Materia Tributaria
  • Corregir subtítulo y considerandos en sentencia C-933/14
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Corrección en cualquier tiempo
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El memorialista solicitó corregir la sentencia C-933/14, porque al momento de reseñar el concepto técnico del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Tributario, mencionó al Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal.

La Corte accede a lo solicitado y, en consecuencia, corrige el subtítulo “del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal” de la página 6 de la precitada providencia, en el sentido de indicar que la palabra Procesal, se reemplaza por la palabra Tributario.

En igual sentido, se corrigen los considerandos 37, 38 y 47 del mismo fallo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CORREGIR el subtitulo "del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal" de la pagina 6 de la providencia C-933 de 2014, de manera que la palabra "PROCESAL" sea remplazada por "TRIBUTARIO".
  2. Segundo. CORREGIR en los considerandos 37 (segunda y ultima linea), 38 y 47 de la providencia (paginas 29 y 31 de la sentencia C-933 de 2014), de manera que la expresion "Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal" sea remplazada por "Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Tributario".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.