JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 17, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Felix Antonio Cifuentes Olarte·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela De Trabajador Aforado
  • Denegar por segunda vez solicitud de cumplimiento sentencia T-937/06 por cuanto se constató reintegro al cargo que venía desempeñando y está pendiente pronunciamiento para reconocimiento de prestaciones
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional en relación con órdenes complejas dictadas para superar el estado de cosas inconstitucional
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Cumplimiento.

Se deniega por segunda vez la solicitud de cumplimiento elevada por el peticionario, al no advertirse un manifiesto incumplimiento de las decisiones de tutela o que las mismas hubiesen resultado insuficientes o ineficaces.

Igualmente, porque no se comprobó que se estuviera en presencia de un estado de cosas inconstitucional que conllevara la expedición de órdenes complejas.

NEGADA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. Primero. DENEGAR por segunda vez la solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-937 de 2006, promovida por el senor Felix Antonio Cifuentes Olarte contra la Empresa de Energia de Cundinamarca, atendiendo a lo establecido en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Reporting justice
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.