JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 5, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Jose Darismel Cortes Alvarez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acceso A La Administracion De Justicia
  • Cumplimiento de términos procesales
Accion De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Carácter público e informal
Accion Publica De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Derecho del ciudadano a participar en la conformación, ejercicio y control del poder político
  • Requisitos
Recurso De Suplica
  • Termino de interposición
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto de 9 de marzo de 2010, dictado por el Magistrado Juan Carlos Henao Pérez, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada en el proceso de la referencia.

La Sala encuentra que el accionante no observó los términos concedidos, ni para corregir la demanda, ni para presentar el correspondiente recurso de súplica, por lo tanto se decide rechazar el recurso por extemporáneo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Jose Darismel Cortes Alvarez, contra el auto del 9 de marzo de 2009, proferido por el Magistrado Juan Carlos Henao Perez, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda instaurada contra el articulo 6 (parcial) de la Ley 1350 de 2009, y el articulo 3 (parcial) del Decreto 1014 de 2000, radicada con el numero D-8013.
  2. Notifiquese, cumplase, archivese el expediente e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.