JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 1, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Julio Nicolas Acosta Reyes Vs. Ifi Concesion De Salinas

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado Segundo Laboral del Circuito de Cartagena, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la acción de tutela del ciudadano de la referencia contra el Instituto de Fomento Industrial, IFI, Concesión de Salinas, de conformidad con lo establecido en el Decreto 1382 de 2000 en su Art. 1° (numeral 1, inciso segundo).

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado 2deg Laboral del Circuito de Cartagena, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela de Julio Nicolas Acosta Reyes contra el Instituto de Fomento Industrial, IFI, Concesion de Salinas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.