A- de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
✓Claimant Miriam Vasco Pabon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto la solicitud se presentó después de realizado el reparto de los expedientes
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
No accedió a la acumulación solicitada por el accionante, con relación a las demandas a que hacen referencia los procesos D-2801 y D-2859.
Lo anterior, porque la solicitud presentada fue extemporánea, razón por la cual no se ajusta a los requisitos de conformidad con el Art. 47 del Acuerdo No. 05 de 1992, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- No acceder a la acumulación solicitada por el ciudadano Heriberto
- Segundo. Villamil Peña.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.