JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 1, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Alcibiades Ortiz Trujillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibagué, Sala de Decisión Penal, asumir el conocimiento de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Red de Solidaridad Social, la Presidencia de la República, el Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público y el Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, de conformidad con el inciso 1° del numeral 1° del Art. 1° del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, en ejercicio de sus atribuciones constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Ordenar al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibague, Sala de Decision Penal, asumir en forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela promovida por Alcibiades Ortiz Trujillo contra la Red de Solidaridad Social, la Presidencia de la Republica, el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico y el Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.