JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 29, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Carlos Enrique Ardila Obando·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion Publica De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Cumplimiento de requisitos mínimos
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Razones claras, suficientes, conducentes y pertinentes
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica contra el auto del 24 de febrero de 2012, proferido por el Magistrado Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por encontrar que las correcciones presentadas no fueron suficientes para estructurar los cargos de inconstitucionalidad inicialmente alegados.

La Sala Plena CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. CONFIRMAR el auto del 24 de febrero de 2012, mediante el cual se resolvio rechazar la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Carlos Enrique Ardila Obando contra el articulo 276 (parcial) de la Ley 1450 de 2011, "Por la cual se expide el plan nacional de desarrollo 2010-2014".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.